|
This series takes us up to about 1952 and ends with an
important turning point in Sam's life. Although
the titular character, it is by no means a star vehicle for Mark
McManus. Sam remains a
central focus throughout but just as much screen-time is given over to
scenes featuring other characters.
SAM is a studio-shot living-room drama with most of the
scenes played out in the various characters' front rooms and sometimes
the pub. It is not an
episodic story-of-the-week type series, but a soap-opera-like saga that
develops as the episodes move on. People
marry, others die - and in mid-series the narrative jumps forward three
years as Sam returns home from a period working as a seaman.
SO
IS IT ANY GOOD?
As the old saying goes "They don't make them like
this anymore". But
more's the pity, I say. Some
argue that seventies TV wasn't really any better than it is today but is
just being viewed through rose-tinted spectacles.
But can that be true? Here is a series I've never seen before -
never even heard of it in actual fact - so I've no nostalgic attachment
to it - and I think it's great. I
didn't make "allowances" for it being made in the seventies
but just watched it as if it was made yesterday.
Perhaps there are some seventies series that haven't aged well
but this is not one of them.
The quality of the acting and writing is first rate.
Writer John Finch, who also wrote "A Family At War" a
few years prior to this, definitely has an ear for dialogue and takes
time to develop his characters within scenes whilst never forgetting his
plot has to move on. It
never feels hurried but doesn't drag either.
Here is a piece of seventies TV that will draw you in.
It might help a bit to have seen series 1 first - but I haven't
and it didn't seem to matter once I had got to grips with who was who
and what their relationships to each other were -
(character biographies in the extras would have been nice
- but sadly not).
ANY
SPECIAL FEATURES?
Extras are routine.
Cast filmographies and writer biography as well as some
production photos and background to its origins.
Also some press quotes from the time about how the critics
enjoyed it.
|